August 12th, 2016 | Sterling
Understanding Global Screening
Hiring candidates who currently work or previously worked in other countries adds a layer of complexity and mystery to criminal record checks. Compliance with foreign privacy laws, the type of information available, budget, turnaround time and how to interpret results are all key considerations for most recruiters.
For example, I recently worked with a Canadian organization that historically sent candidates to the local police to obtain a Criminal Record Check – a typical scenario for employers in Canada, as police services can provide a comprehensive, nationwide search supplying the organization with all the information they desired.
While this process is completely acceptable for Canadian applicants, it is not necessarily best practice in other countries, as this organization discovered when they were recently looking to hire an individual from the United States.
Similar to their Canadian applicants, they asked an American to obtain a Criminal Record Check from local authorities. The applicant happily obliged and provided a ‘clear’ result for a Criminal Record Check from their local county. Assuming it was a comprehensive, nationwide search as it would be in Canada, the organization looked to place the applicant.
Thankfully, someone Googled the applicant’s name prior to offering a position working with children and uncovered many news articles naming the applicant as a sex offender.
Shocked, and legitimately confused, they did some research and learned the United States’ process for obtaining a comprehensive Criminal Record Check differs greatly from Canada. It is imperative to obtain a complete address history for an American applicant so you can drill down into each state and county of residence.
In this situation, the applicant had a myriad of sex offences over the past six years, but in a separate state from where he currently resides. This organization managed to catch the oversight before it was too late, but it underscores the importance of analyzing applicable law and industry specific considerations. Legal and regulatory requirements may impose obligations to screen your employees, even globally, for certain types of processing and in certain sectors and industries.
Generally speaking, there are three types of searches which can be positioned under the “criminal” category.
- Comprehensive Criminal: Not available in all countries, this involves a background screening company working directly with the local court, police service or other authority to obtain a comprehensive list of convictions/criminality.
- Applicant Obtained: Not available in all countries, this process requires the applicant to obtain their Criminal Record check directly from the same authorities listed above.
- Criminality: Available in all countries, this search scours various watch lists and adverse media to obtain a thorough background check on a candidate.
A Comprehensive Criminal search is ideal, but is not available in each country. Even when it is available, the cost or turnaround time may be discouraging.
For these reasons, it’s important to not only research what type of check is available and appropriate, but to weigh the availability of information and compliance concerns with your organization’s desire to monitor costs and turnaround time.
It’s also important to remember the definition of criminal activity can vary from country to country, and even region to region within a country. Consider the recent trend to legalize or decriminalize marijuana possession as an example.
To best prepare your organization for global screening challenges, research what level of check is required or appropriate in each jurisdiction, how accessible that level of check is and how the process might vary from your local area.
To learn more about best practices for screening job candidates in foreign countries and those who have lived, studied or worked across the borders or internationally, read our white paper: Background Screening for a Global Workforce
Background Screening For a Global Workforce
This content is offered for informational purposes only. First Advantage is not a law firm, and this content does not, and is not intended to, constitute legal advice. Information in this may not constitute the most up-to-date legal or other information.
Readers of this content should contact their attorney or lawyer to obtain advice concerning any particular legal matter. No reader, or user of this content, should act or refrain from acting on the basis of information in this content without first seeking legal advice from counsel or lawyers in the relevant jurisdiction. Only your individual attorney or legal advisor can provide assurances that the information contained herein – and your interpretation of it – is applicable or appropriate to your particular situation. Use of, and access to, this content does not create an attorney-client relationship between the reader, or user of this presentation and First Advantage.